Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL225
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
- Alternative Name is ST550
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL225, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-20 was unveiled 4 years after the TL225 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the WG-20 matches up versus the TL225 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung TL225. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Samsung TL225
WG-20 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | August 2009 | Newer by 55 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh WG-20
TL225 | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
Screen resolution | 1152k | 230k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung TL225
WG-20 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-20 features physical dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL225 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the WG-20 against the TL225.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-20 and TL225 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-20 and TL225.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-20 to deliver extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent WG-20 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung TL225 |
Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2009-08-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 164 gr (0.36 pounds) | 187 gr (0.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $370 | $488 |