Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL240
93 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5000
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL240, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-20 was announced 4 years after the TL240 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-20 scores against the TL240 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung TL240. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Samsung TL240
WG-20 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | January 2010 | Newer by 50 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh WG-20
TL240 | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung TL240
WG-20 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-20 provides outer dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL240 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-20 versus the TL240.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-20 and TL240 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The image below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-20 and TL240.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures but you might want to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The younger WG-20 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung TL240 |
Otherwise known as | - | ST5000 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 164g (0.36 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $370 | $171 |