Clicky

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320

Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37
Ricoh WG-20 front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
34
Features
36
Overall
34

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-20
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
  • Released February 2014
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Alternate Name is WB1000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 Overview

In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The WG-20 was introduced 5 years later than the TL320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the WG-20 grades against the TL320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Samsung TL320

 WG-20 TL320 
LaunchedFebruary 2014February 2009More recent by 61 months

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh WG-20

 TL320 WG-20 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung TL320

 WG-20 TL320 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-20 offers outside measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-20 against the TL320.

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-20 and TL320 is 93 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-20 and TL320.

As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-20 to resolve greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The fresher WG-20 should have an edge in sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-20 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography highlights
39
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
33
has manual focus
supports face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-20 Street photography highlights
Samsung TL320 Street photography highlights
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
58
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-20 Sports photography info
Samsung TL320 Sports photography info
44
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-20 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Travel photography camera
71
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
59
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-20 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography highlights
47
focusing manually
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
43
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-20 Vlogging factors
Samsung TL320 Vlogging factors
30
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic support
31
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh WG-20Samsung TL320
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-20 Samsung TL320
Otherwise known as - WB1000
Type Waterproof Ultracompact
Released 2014-02-05 2009-02-23
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m (Auto ISO) 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 164 grams (0.36 lb) -
Dimensions 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $370 $380