Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB2200F
93 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Ricoh WG-20 versus Samsung WB2200F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-20 was launched very close to the WB2200F so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the WG-20 grades against the WB2200F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-20 & Samsung WB2200F. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Samsung WB2200F
| WG-20 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh WG-20
| WB2200F | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung WB2200F
| WG-20 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2014 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-20 comes with physical dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-20 versus Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-20 versus the WB2200F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-20 and WB2200F is 93 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-20 and WB2200F.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB2200F to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1/8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 164g (0.36 lbs) | 708g (1.56 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $370 | $599 |
