Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f6b9/0f6b92e8e7b3c6a64e703e8b995daab652fd7cfe" alt="Ricoh WG-20 front Ricoh WG-20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eddc/7eddc1de1900bdf7cc3907ab82968f90c4856591" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3N front Sony Alpha NEX-3N front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched February 2013
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Refreshed by Sony a5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-20 versus Sony NEX-3N, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the NEX-3N (16MP) is pretty well matched but the WG-20 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-20 was announced 12 months later than the NEX-3N which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-20 grades versus the NEX-3N in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-20 and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Sony NEX-3N
WG-20 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2013 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh WG-20
NEX-3N | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Sony NEX-3N
WG-20 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-20 features external dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-20 versus Sony NEX-3N in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-20 and the NEX-3N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd7e6/cd7e647ca1f13f886700ac62b0e0b7970af869dd" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-20 and NEX-3N is 93 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/500de/500de70eb956e1037267c524134019e99641e742" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The photograph here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-20 and NEX-3N.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-20 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony NEX-3N will resolve more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The younger WG-20 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c5b2/7c5b225435608097855010e1d0370983b57ecd97" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b185/1b1852ea703d2f2f816130909f1ee39a1100958a" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Ricoh WG-20 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-20 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2013-02-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 164 grams (0.36 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 pictures | 480 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $370 | $399 |