Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f6b9/0f6b92e8e7b3c6a64e703e8b995daab652fd7cfe" alt="Ricoh WG-20 front Ricoh WG-20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e76b5/e76b5f1031fe999502e3c5fe0f06c140249a3cfe" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front"
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Revealed May 2012
- Older Model is Sony HX100V
- Renewed by Sony HX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-20 (14MP) and HX200V (18MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-20 was launched 22 months later than the HX200V making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-20 matches up versus the HX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-20 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Sony HX200V
WG-20 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | May 2012 | Fresher by 22 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh WG-20
HX200V | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Sony HX200V
WG-20 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-20 offers physical dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-20 vs the HX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14d31/14d31e4b0e43f10d7b2c3db1e1264cd5b3b9e65a" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-20 and HX200V is 93 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f409a/f409ad105c2117fff251f47ec2ee25ffc367e784" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-20 and HX200V.
Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony HX200V to show greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-20 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c47c/9c47cdc445b1ac662c3a3fe7dc23338666d031e9" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f94de/f94dea33797908d63c9b039ebac69e0d59dd1d2c" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Ricoh WG-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2012-05-11 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 12.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 164 grams (0.36 lbs) | 583 grams (1.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photographs | 450 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $370 | $480 |