Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ35W
91 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Ricoh WG-30 versus Samsung HZ35W, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the WG-30 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-30 was brought out 4 years later than the HZ35W and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-30 scores vs the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-30 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung HZ35W
| WG-30 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 53 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh WG-30
| HZ35W | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung HZ35W
| WG-30 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-30 features outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-30 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the WG-30 versus the HZ35W.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-30 and HZ35W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-30 and HZ35W.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to resolve greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-30 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also Known as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-10-09 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 192 gr (0.42 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $428 | $300 |
