Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung MV800
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Introduced September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung MV800, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-30 (16MP) and the MV800 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-30 was revealed 3 years after the MV800 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WG-30 scores against the MV800 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-30 & Samsung MV800. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung MV800
| WG-30 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 |  | September 2011 | More modern by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Ricoh WG-30
| MV800 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung MV800
| WG-30 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-30 comes with exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has proportions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung MV800 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the WG-30 compared to the MV800.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-30 and MV800 is 91 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The image below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-30 and MV800.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you can expect similar quality of images although you really should take the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger WG-30 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung MV800 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-10-09 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 192g (0.42 lb) | 121g (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $428 | $499 |