Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
99 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-30 versus Samsung SH100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-30 (16MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-30 was launched 3 years later than the SH100 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-30 scores against the SH100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-30 & Samsung SH100. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery & Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung SH100
| WG-30 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 46 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Ricoh WG-30
| SH100 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung SH100
| WG-30 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-30 provides external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung SH100 has specifications of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-30 versus Samsung SH100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-30 versus the SH100.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30 and SH100 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30 and SH100.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher WG-30 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung SH100 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-10-09 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 192g (0.42 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $428 | $200 |