Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
99 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-30 versus Samsung SH100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-30 (16MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-30 was launched 3 years later than the SH100 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-30 scores against the SH100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-30 & Samsung SH100. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery & Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung SH100
| WG-30 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 46 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Ricoh WG-30
| SH100 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung SH100
| WG-30 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-30 provides external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung SH100 has specifications of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-30 versus Samsung SH100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-30 versus the SH100.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30 and SH100 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30 and SH100.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher WG-30 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung SH100 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-10-09 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 192g (0.42 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $428 | $200 |