Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL320
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL320, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the WG-30 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-30 was launched 5 years after the TL320 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the WG-30 grades against the TL320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung TL320
WG-30 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2014 | February 2009 | More modern by 69 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh WG-30
TL320 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL320
WG-30 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-30 has outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-30 versus the TL320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-30 and TL320 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-30 and TL320.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to give you more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent WG-30 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung TL320 |
Also Known as | - | WB1000 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2014-10-09 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 192 gr (0.42 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $428 | $380 |