Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL350
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also Known as WB2000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL350, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-30 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-30 was unveiled 4 years later than the TL350 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the WG-30 scores versus the TL350 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL350. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung TL350
| WG-30 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2014 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh WG-30
| TL350 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL350
| WG-30 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-30 provides external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL350 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-30 versus the TL350.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-30 and TL350 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30 and TL350.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to show more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher WG-30 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung TL350 |
| Also referred to as | - | WB2000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-10-09 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 192g (0.42 pounds) | 195g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $428 | $400 |