Clicky

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500

Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37
Ricoh WG-30 front
 
Samsung TL500 front
Portability
88
Imaging
34
Features
54
Overall
42

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced October 2014
Samsung TL500
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
  • 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2010
  • Other Name is EX1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-30 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the WG-30 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WG-30 was announced 4 years after the TL500 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-30 scores versus the TL500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung TL500

 WG-30 TL500 
LaunchedOctober 2014July 2010More modern by 52 months

Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Ricoh WG-30

 TL500 WG-30 
Manual focus More exact focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kClearer display (+384k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL500

 WG-30 TL500 
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-30 offers external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-30 compared to the TL500.

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30 and TL500 is 91 and 88 respectively.

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-30 and TL500.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-30 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh WG-30 will result in more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-30 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung TL500 as a Portrait photography camera
35
good megapixels (16MP)
has face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
40
manual focus
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-30
Street photography with Samsung TL500
61
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
66
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition (386g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 Sports photography factors
Samsung TL500 Sports photography factors
45
image stabilization (Digital)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
weather proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
29
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-30
Travel photography with Samsung TL500
71
weather proofing
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
64
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
rather wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (386g)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 Landscape photography factors
Samsung TL500 Landscape photography factors
43
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
52
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
no Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 Vlogging factors
Samsung TL500 Vlogging factors
33
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
has face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of mic jack
64
rather wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (386g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL500
 Ricoh WG-30Samsung TL500
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-30 Samsung TL500
Also referred to as - EX1
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2014-10-09 2010-07-09
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 125 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/1.8-2.4
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.90 m (Auto ISO) 5.20 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format H.264 H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 192 gr (0.42 lb) 386 gr (0.85 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 40
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.2
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.1
DXO Low light score not tested 129
Other
Battery life 300 images -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes Yes (10 sec, 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal SD/SDHC, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $428 $527