Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Other Name is EX1
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-30 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the WG-30 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-30 was announced 4 years after the TL500 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-30 scores versus the TL500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL500. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung TL500
WG-30 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2014 | July 2010 | More modern by 52 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Ricoh WG-30
TL500 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung TL500
WG-30 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-30 offers external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-30 compared to the TL500.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30 and TL500 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-30 and TL500.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-30 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh WG-30 will result in more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-30 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung TL500 |
Also referred to as | - | EX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-10-09 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 192 gr (0.42 lb) | 386 gr (0.85 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $428 | $527 |