Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b2c4/4b2c48a59424bf7e9398646eaf9b305a09be3d25" alt="Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-30 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-30 was released 10 months after the WB35F so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the WG-30 matches up against the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung WB35F
WG-30 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2014 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh WG-30
WB35F | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung WB35F
WG-30 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display size |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-30 comes with physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung WB35F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-30 against the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33f19/33f1942c40150b6fe8f973e07bfa31011a3ea689" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30 and WB35F is 91 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bcb7/5bcb7751e521fb287f325dde6d269b54372f8b66" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30 and WB35F.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution so you should expect comparable quality of photos though you would want to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more recent WG-30 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe928/fe928c966f74711bb2aa34cc29eb6da903805b7e" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d19b/5d19b46c32bb2802065ad067a3cf910b17aaa890" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-30 | Samsung WB35F |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2014-10-09 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 192 gr (0.42 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $428 | $130 |