Clicky

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37
Ricoh WG-30 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced October 2014
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung WB800F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-30 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WG-30 was launched 22 months after the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-30 scores versus the WB800F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung WB800F

 WG-30 WB800F 
RevealedOctober 2014January 2013Newer by 22 months

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh WG-30

 WB800F WG-30 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung WB800F

 WG-30 WB800F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-30 provides outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the WG-30 and the WB800F.

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-30 and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30 and WB800F.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution and you should expect comparable quality of files though you might want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The younger WG-30 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-30
Portrait photography with Samsung WB800F
35
MP count good (16 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
44
focusing manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-30
Street photography with Samsung WB800F
61
image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (218 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh WG-30
Sports photography with Samsung WB800F
45
image stabilization (Digital)
MP count good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
53
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-30
Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
71
environment sealing
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competitors in class (218 grams)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography advice
43
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
MP count good (16MP)
environment sealing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
50
focusing manually
pretty wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB800F Vlogging factors
33
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic port
35
pretty wide (23mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (218g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
missing external mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung WB800F
 Ricoh WG-30Samsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-30 Samsung WB800F
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2014-10-09 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 125 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 16 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.90 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 192g (0.42 lbs) 218g (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $428 $300