Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b2c4/4b2c48a59424bf7e9398646eaf9b305a09be3d25" alt="Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46cfd/46cfd6b1b2504d733a07dd4a231b6abe09baa859" alt="Sigma SD1 Merrill front Sigma SD1 Merrill front"
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Older Model is Sigma SD1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Let's look closer at the Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sigma. The resolution of the WG-30 (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively close but the WG-30 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-30 was launched 2 years later than the SD1 Merrill and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the WG-30 grades vs the SD1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-30 & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
WG-30 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2014 | ![]() | April 2012 | Fresher by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-30
SD1 Merrill | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
WG-30 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-30 enjoys exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-30 versus the SD1 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27a98/27a98488f3ac575f1004b6e7c81d96271a5c9195" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-30 and SD1 Merrill is 91 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba562/ba562e88bad4b8ab56a43a4a144b447fd7f1104e" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-30 and SD1 Merrill.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-30 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh WG-30 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-30 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8064/f806466ed2eda444374b28a27b4452feba28a1c2" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/103dc/103dc09ff6017686457e6020836852c39e44a3c9" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-30 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-30 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-10-09 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 192 grams (0.42 lb) | 790 grams (1.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $428 | $2,339 |