Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b2c4/4b2c48a59424bf7e9398646eaf9b305a09be3d25" alt="Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57da5/57da55bc092010e6c2734595d664451750b4424f" alt="Sigma sd Quattro front Sigma sd Quattro front"
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Ricoh WG-30 versus Sigma Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-30 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the WG-30 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-30 was released 16 months earlier than the Quattro which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-30 grades against the Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-30 & Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Sigma Quattro
WG-30 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh WG-30
Quattro | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | October 2014 | More modern by 16 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Sigma Quattro
WG-30 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-30 provides outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-30 versus Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-30 vs the Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03236/03236e57fc910dd7cc5431b492c34a6f45caa758" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30 and Quattro is 91 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7c7a/a7c7a90e66a743f0288449f7ee2341d6e184217a" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The pic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30 and Quattro.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-30 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sigma Quattro will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged WG-30 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18b97/18b972437e11fa4164eaf977de0855c823c2914c" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acbde/acbde49a4491a8e3fc5c70fdaf0bc1a96fdc84df" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Ricoh WG-30 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-30 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-10-09 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 192 gr (0.42 lbs) | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $428 | $738 |