Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b2c4/4b2c48a59424bf7e9398646eaf9b305a09be3d25" alt="Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfb5/1cfb573f9a199713750718c4e753341b4a66f33c" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front"
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released January 2008
- Successor is Sony A330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the WG-30 (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WG-30 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-30 was unveiled 6 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the WG-30 grades against the A300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-30 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-30 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Sony A300
WG-30 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2014 | ![]() | January 2008 | Fresher by 82 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh WG-30
A300 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Sony A300
WG-30 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-30 features outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-30 versus the A300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ca37/1ca37644281adf27f7154378b2fb84d2030d26fc" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-30 and A300 is 91 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce344/ce3449b2d9d34804e40827c52cc77b559d168c43" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The visual below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-30 and A300.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-30 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Ricoh WG-30 will render greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively. The newer WG-30 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21e8e/21e8e1b2dc4a363397c97854f863a01a95151648" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e152/7e152339cb84fb87c9ba29cc322ee39f9241ff7b" alt="Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30 vs Sony A300 Specifications
Ricoh WG-30 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-30 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2014-10-09 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 192 grams (0.42 lbs) | 632 grams (1.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $428 | $0 |