Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1078/c1078d8ddb245a6ab2a1dc6bdfacc2fe6d159f8a" alt="Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d855c/d855c4cbe7d9d28e98143d16fe9df7ae12246ddd" alt="Samsung CL5 front Samsung CL5 front"
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung CL5, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the WG-30W (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the WG-30W (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The WG-30W was launched 5 years after the CL5 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-30W matches up versus the CL5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-30W & Samsung CL5. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Samsung CL5
WG-30W | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 69 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh WG-30W
CL5 | WG-30W |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung CL5
WG-30W | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-30W offers outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung CL5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the WG-30W versus the CL5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d462/9d462f477f1ef59bf7c0238dce03f9cd8ce30cb9" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30W and CL5 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63c1f/63c1f9fe00466cfb29f09d628b6768297b10cc5c" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The pic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-30W and CL5.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-30W featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh WG-30W will render greater detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher WG-30W provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea81f/ea81fecf28bcf3e82f6b91cf6bc6987f657c7a4f" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9912e/9912ef965c1fecbd1ed3229f1cc136aff89bfba0" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung CL5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung CL5 |
Also called as | - | PL10 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-10-09 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 141g (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $280 | $391 |