Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1078/c1078d8ddb245a6ab2a1dc6bdfacc2fe6d159f8a" alt="Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/083e2/083e2627ee16c701325d05e6125ad917fcb73074" alt="Samsung NX11 front Samsung NX11 front"
80 Imaging
55 Features
50 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Launched December 2010
- Superseded the Samsung NX10
- Successor is Samsung NX20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung NX11, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-30W (16MP) and the NX11 (15MP) is very similar but the WG-30W (1/2.3") and NX11 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-30W was revealed 3 years after the NX11 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX11 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the WG-30W grades vs the NX11 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-30W & Samsung NX11. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery & Samsung NX11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Samsung NX11
WG-30W | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2014 | ![]() | December 2010 | Newer by 47 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX11 over the Ricoh WG-30W
NX11 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung NX11
WG-30W | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-30W has got outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung NX11 has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") having a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung NX11 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-30W against the NX11.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0ff/9a0ffd4d3852b06a3ac4a3c52c3a076d7dcc04b0" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-30W and NX11 is 91 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37b3f/37b3f7f595026e1657b452f232b9113f87809d03" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-30W and NX11.
Clearly, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-30W with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Ricoh WG-30W will deliver more detail because of its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher WG-30W should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bba89/bba89382f663c47b258dec333fd5dfadee021ebe" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6b3b/f6b3b65ab3913dede64de1c3d0bcd1b2c1b231bb" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung NX11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung NX11 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-10-09 | 2010-12-28 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | DRIM Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 11.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 499 gr (1.10 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 553 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 400 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $280 | $626 |