Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1078/c1078d8ddb245a6ab2a1dc6bdfacc2fe6d159f8a" alt="Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9341/e93412f40c7362d3e09ff5f3d2f972e609f5d64d" alt="Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Ricoh WG-30W versus Samsung SL202, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the WG-30W (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-30W was announced 5 years after the SL202 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-30W grades versus the SL202 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Samsung SL202
WG-30W | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 69 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh WG-30W
SL202 | WG-30W |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung SL202
WG-30W | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-30W offers outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-30W versus Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the WG-30W vs the SL202.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/597eb/597eb0ab066f90aba3d528bd0ab8872836bb9bd4" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30W and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94945/949452d8cc8c169300b7240fcbdd2ff309ff340c" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-30W and SL202.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-30W to deliver greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The younger WG-30W provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c99f/0c99f011570fc55f700628bc19b3e7546d3020a5" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bca84/bca84a595cb1707ef2f75b7df3ea4f4fabf18455" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung SL202 |
Also called | - | PL50 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-10-09 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $280 | $140 |