Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung ST95
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung ST95, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-30W (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-30W was launched 3 years after the ST95 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the WG-30W grades against the ST95 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-30W & Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Samsung ST95
| WG-30W | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 46 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| ST95 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung ST95
| WG-30W | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-30W has outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-30W compared to the ST95.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-30W and ST95 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The picture underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-30W and ST95.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of files though you may want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more recent WG-30W provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung ST95 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-10-09 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $280 | $145 |