Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung TL350
91 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is WB2000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-30W versus Samsung TL350, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-30W (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-30W was unveiled 4 years after the TL350 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-30W matches up versus the TL350 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung TL350. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Samsung TL350
| WG-30W | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| TL350 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung TL350
| WG-30W | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-30W features exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-30W versus Samsung TL350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-30W and the TL350.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-30W and TL350 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing specifications. The pic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30W and TL350.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-30W to produce more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The younger WG-30W is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung TL350 |
| Also called as | - | WB2000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-10-09 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 195g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $280 | $400 |
