Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Newer Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Ricoh WG-30W and Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the WG-30W (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively well matched but the WG-30W (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-30W was manufactured 2 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-30W grades vs the DP2 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-30W & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
| WG-30W | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 | February 2012 | More recent by 33 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-30W
| DP2 Merrill | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Sigma DP2 Merrill
| WG-30W | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-30W has exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-30W and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-30W vs the DP2 Merrill.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30W and DP2 Merrill is 91 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30W and DP2 Merrill.
All in all, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-30W because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh WG-30W will resolve extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-30W is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30W | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
| Model | Ricoh WG-30W | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-10-09 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 640x480 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 330 grams (0.73 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $931 |