Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1078/c1078d8ddb245a6ab2a1dc6bdfacc2fe6d159f8a" alt="Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04d9/f04d99e0c26c31be60485c208bc04019fbc69c93" alt="Sigma DP2 Merrill front Sigma DP2 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Newer Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Ricoh WG-30W and Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the WG-30W (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively well matched but the WG-30W (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-30W was manufactured 2 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-30W grades vs the DP2 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-30W & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-30W | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 33 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-30W
DP2 Merrill | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-30W | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-30W has exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-30W and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-30W vs the DP2 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e297/3e297581683ed15f19ceb65a260c2265794a36af" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30W and DP2 Merrill is 91 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cf7f/8cf7f608aac2046fc684b6ea2e7fa28a0beba863" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30W and DP2 Merrill.
All in all, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-30W because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh WG-30W will resolve extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-30W is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d47/00d47ea27d4e4b2a4cf712b2993237382243db7d" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee468/ee46886c4b10b704b28bd4c68de9520a202287ef" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-30W | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-30W | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-10-09 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 640x480 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 330 grams (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $280 | $931 |