Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-80
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-70
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-80, both Waterproof cameras and both of them are designed by Ricoh. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-4 GPS was launched 9 years before the WG-80 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WG-4 GPS matches up against the WG-80 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Ricoh WG-80. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh WG-80
WG-4 GPS | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
WG-80 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2022 | February 2014 | More modern by 100 months |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Ricoh WG-80
WG-4 GPS | WG-80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-80 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the WG-80.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and WG-80 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The image here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and WG-80.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of images though you need to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged WG-4 GPS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Ricoh WG-80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Ricoh WG-80 |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2022-05-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.70 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | 300 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $210 | $300 |