Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof cameras and they are both produced by Ricoh. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-4 GPS was manufactured 7 months earlier than the WG-M1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the WG-4 GPS matches up versus the WG-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh WG-M1
WG-4 GPS | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 115k | Clearer screen (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
WG-M1 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | February 2014 | Fresher by 7 months |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Ricoh WG-M1
WG-4 GPS | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the WG-M1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The visual underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and WG-M1.
All in all, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The older WG-4 GPS will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 350 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $210 | $2,000 |