Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung CL80
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
95 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is ST5500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung CL80, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is fairly close and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-4 GPS was introduced 4 years later than the CL80 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the WG-4 GPS grades against the CL80 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung CL80. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung CL80
| WG-4 GPS | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 50 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| CL80 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.7" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung CL80
| WG-4 GPS | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung CL80 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the CL80.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and CL80 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The photograph below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and CL80.
All in all, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to render extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger WG-4 GPS provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung CL80 |
| Also Known as | - | ST5500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $210 | $400 |
