Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-10
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Introduced September 2006
- New Model is Samsung GX-20
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung GX-10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-4 GPS was revealed 7 years later than the GX-10 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-4 GPS scores vs the GX-10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung GX-10. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung GX-10
WG-4 GPS | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | September 2006 | Fresher by 90 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 210k | Crisper display (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
GX-10 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung GX-10
WG-4 GPS | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS comes with physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung GX-10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the GX-10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and GX-10 is 90 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The visual below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and GX-10.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 GPS with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will offer you extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung GX-10 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2006-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 793 gr (1.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $210 | $850 |