Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Launched January 2006
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-4 GPS was revealed 8 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS grades vs the GX-1S when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung GX-1S. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung GX-1S
| WG-4 GPS | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | January 2006 | Newer by 99 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 210k | Crisper display (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| GX-1S | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung GX-1S
| WG-4 GPS | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the GX-1S.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and GX-1S is 90 and 68 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing technical specs. The image below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and GX-1S.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 GPS having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will show extra detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung GX-1S |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 605 gr (1.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $210 | $850 |