Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Launched January 2006
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-4 GPS was revealed 8 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS grades vs the GX-1S when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung GX-1S. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung GX-1S
| WG-4 GPS | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | January 2006 | Newer by 99 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 210k | Crisper display (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| GX-1S | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung GX-1S
| WG-4 GPS | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the GX-1S.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and GX-1S is 90 and 68 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing technical specs. The image below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and GX-1S.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 GPS having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will show extra detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung GX-1S |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 605 gr (1.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $210 | $850 |