Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5277/b527708835db132b53ec37264dc6230bff75beef" alt="Samsung NX100 front Samsung NX100 front"
88 Imaging
55 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 282g - 120 x 71 x 35mm
- Launched September 2010
- Renewed by Samsung NX200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung NX100, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the NX100 (15MP) is very comparable but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and NX100 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was revealed 3 years after the NX100 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the WG-4 GPS grades against the NX100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung NX100. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung NX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung NX100
WG-4 GPS | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | September 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX100 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
NX100 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung NX100
WG-4 GPS | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX100 has specifications of 120mm x 71mm x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung NX100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the NX100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f637/0f63777d05be3a086682a3c688280b55e9934462" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and NX100 is 90 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82753/827536bef3fee606081889dc393825362ed49a61" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and NX100.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS having a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will show greater detail because of its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The younger WG-4 GPS provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cc92/7cc9266af21f34c38a05fc0c3192586202214dbc" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77227/77227d8edef9bd851e20892f7af1a28ba833ae96" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX100 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung NX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung NX100 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2010-09-14 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | DRIMe Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | VGA AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 282g (0.62 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 120 x 71 x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 62 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 563 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | 420 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $210 | $386 |