Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30878/3087870e2a184bb7b129e14c5c1172ecd9956fa4" alt="Samsung NX1000 front Samsung NX1000 front"
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Newer Model is Samsung NX1100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the NX1000 (20MP) is fairly similar but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and NX1000 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was announced 22 months later than the NX1000 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS scores vs the NX1000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung NX1000. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung NX1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung NX1000
WG-4 GPS | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | April 2012 | More recent by 22 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1000 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
NX1000 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung NX1000
WG-4 GPS | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS comes with outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung NX1000 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS and the NX1000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37c61/37c61fdf7fe20c2582778d8137db6f37233426f3" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and NX1000 is 90 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47115/47115a4ec9f2074d5f9f327334904aca466a5a89" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and NX1000.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 GPS using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX1000 will offer more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d243/2d2432b5bdc4aa507d02cf352290464302c125cf" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59b9/e59b9e9b979da23c5c3fd74e780ee88516b02e54" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung NX1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung NX1000 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2012-04-19 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 840 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 320 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $210 | $388 |