Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX300
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX210
- Successor is Samsung NX500
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX300, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the NX300 (20MP) is fairly similar but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 GPS was announced 3 months after the NX300 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS scores vs the NX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung NX300. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung NX300
WG-4 GPS | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
NX300 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 768k | 460k | Crisper display (+308k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung NX300
WG-4 GPS | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | November 2013 | Similar age | |
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has sizing of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the NX300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and NX300 is 90 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and NX300.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX300 will offer extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung NX300 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2013-11-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 331g (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $210 | $750 |