Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL120
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
99 Imaging
37 Features
20 Overall
30
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL120 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung PL120, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the PL120 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 GPS was brought out 3 years after the PL120 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung PL120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the WG-4 GPS scores against the PL120 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL120 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung PL120. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung PL120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung PL120
WG-4 GPS | PL120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | January 2011 | Newer by 38 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL120 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
PL120 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung PL120
WG-4 GPS | PL120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL120 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL120 has measurements of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung PL120 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the PL120.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and PL120 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL120 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and PL120.
As you can see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide you with greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL120 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL120 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung PL120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung PL120 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | - |
Price at launch | $210 | $150 |