Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL170
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
99 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL170 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 95 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL170 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung PL170, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the PL170 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-4 GPS was brought out 3 years later than the PL170 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung PL170 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WG-4 GPS grades vs the PL170 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL170 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung PL170. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung PL170 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung PL170
WG-4 GPS | PL170 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 38 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL170 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
PL170 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung PL170
WG-4 GPS | PL170 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL170 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung PL170 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung PL170 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the PL170.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and PL170 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL170 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and PL170.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels so you should expect similar quality of photos however you will need to take the release date of the products into consideration. The more modern WG-4 GPS should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL170 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL170 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung PL170 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung PL170 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 95 x 57 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $210 | $175 |