Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
![Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-4-GPS/Ricoh-WG-4-GPS-front.jpg)
![Samsung PL200 front Samsung PL200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-PL200/Samsung-PL200-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung PL200, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The WG-4 GPS was brought out 3 years after the PL200 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the WG-4 GPS matches up versus the PL200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung PL200
WG-4 GPS | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 44 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
PL200 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung PL200
WG-4 GPS | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung PL200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-4 GPS and the PL200.
![Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-4-GPS-vs-Samsung-PL200-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and PL200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
![Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-4-GPS-vs-Samsung-PL200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The pic underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and PL200.
All in all, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
![Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Ricoh-WG-4-GPS-vs-Samsung-PL200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-4-GPS-vs-Samsung-PL200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung PL200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung PL200 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 170g (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $210 | $0 |