Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df693/df69387fe87eac181e86e6c666e2ea860e4d4ffa" alt="Samsung PL200 front Samsung PL200 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung PL200, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was brought out 3 years after the PL200 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the WG-4 GPS matches up versus the PL200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung PL200
WG-4 GPS | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 44 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
PL200 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung PL200
WG-4 GPS | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung PL200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-4 GPS and the PL200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5247c/5247ca457a006b88bc8cd8a8ce6f4bde39a7bce8" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and PL200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cea0/7cea0d8b7d89c762a09d1fa2ce685ec91bf04a08" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The pic underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and PL200.
All in all, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ad3e/8ad3eeac3e68713daa778d601441528cdba5bd2e" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a63c8/a63c83c18ac794bf18b4310506293f030a3892a1" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung PL200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung PL200 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 170g (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $210 | $0 |