Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL102
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung SL102, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was released 5 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the WG-4 GPS matches up against the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung SL102
| WG-4 GPS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 62 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| SL102 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL102
| WG-4 GPS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the SL102.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and SL102.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternate name | - | ES55 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $210 | $130 |