Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL30
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is ES15
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL30, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and SL30 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was introduced 5 years later than the SL30 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the WG-4 GPS grades vs the SL30 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL30. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung SL30
| WG-4 GPS | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 61 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| SL30 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL30
| WG-4 GPS | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung SL30 has sizing of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL30 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS and the SL30.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and SL30 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by checking technical specs. The visual below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and SL30.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL30 |
| Also called | - | ES15 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $210 | $93 |
