Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL820
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as IT100
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung SL820, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and SL820 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-4 GPS was revealed 5 years after the SL820 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the WG-4 GPS matches up versus the SL820 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung SL820. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung SL820
| WG-4 GPS | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 61 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| SL820 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL820
| WG-4 GPS | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung SL820 has specifications of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung SL820 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the SL820.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and SL820 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and SL820.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to result in greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL820 |
| Also called as | - | IT100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $210 | $280 |