Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-4 GPS was unveiled 3 years after the ST65 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS matches up versus the ST65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung ST65. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung ST65
WG-4 GPS | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | January 2011 | More modern by 38 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
ST65 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST65
WG-4 GPS | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS enjoys physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the ST65.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and ST65 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and ST65.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST65 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $210 | $130 |