Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Announced February 2014
  • Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The WG-4 GPS was unveiled 3 years after the ST65 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS matches up versus the ST65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung ST65

 WG-4 GPS ST65 
IntroducedFebruary 2014January 2011More modern by 38 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 ST65 WG-4 GPS 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST65

 WG-4 GPS ST65 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Screen resolution460k460kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS enjoys physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the ST65.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and ST65 is 90 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and ST65.

As you have seen, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography info
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography info
41
manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
offers face detection autofocus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
28
good resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Street photography with Samsung ST65
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (235g)
49
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
max ISO too low (0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography factors
Samsung ST65 Sports photography factors
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
slow fps (2.0 fps)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery life (240 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
26
good resolution (14MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Travel photography highlights
69
environment proofing
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery life (240 shots)
more heavy than competition in class (235 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
71
good resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
great max aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse function
does not posses selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography highlights
54
manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery life (240 per charge)
37
great max aperture (f)
good sized screen (3 inch)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Vlogging with Samsung ST65
34
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (235 grams)
27
great max aperture (f)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST65
 Ricoh WG-4 GPSSamsung ST65
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-4 GPS Samsung ST65
Type Waterproof Ultracompact
Announced 2014-02-05 2011-01-19
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 -
Min native ISO 125 -
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) ()
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 235g (0.52 lb) -
Physical dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal -
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $210 $130