Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST700
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2011
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST700, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is very close and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-4 GPS was manufactured 3 years later than the ST700 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WG-4 GPS scores against the ST700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung ST700. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung ST700
WG-4 GPS | ST700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
ST700 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST700
WG-4 GPS | ST700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung ST700 has specifications of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST700 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the ST700.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and ST700 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and ST700.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you should always take the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer WG-4 GPS will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST700 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | - |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $210 | $280 |