Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL220
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
95 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Also referred to as ST500
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL220 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung TL220, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and TL220 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-4 GPS was unveiled 4 years after the TL220 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the TL220 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung TL220. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung TL220
| WG-4 GPS | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | August 2009 | More modern by 55 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| TL220 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL220
| WG-4 GPS | TL220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung TL220 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung TL220 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the TL220.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and TL220 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The picture here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and TL220.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL220 |
| Also called | - | ST500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lb) | 169 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $210 | $90 |