Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL225
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Also Known as ST550
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL225, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 GPS was launched 4 years later than the TL225 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the WG-4 GPS scores against the TL225 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL225. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung TL225
| WG-4 GPS | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| TL225 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL225
| WG-4 GPS | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL225 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the TL225.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and TL225 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing technical specs. The visual below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and TL225.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL225 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,152k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 187g (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $210 | $488 |