Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL350
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Other Name is WB2000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL350, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe WG-4 GPS was introduced 4 years later than the TL350 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 GPS grades against the TL350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL350. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung TL350
| WG-4 GPS | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 49 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| TL350 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL350
| WG-4 GPS | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the TL350.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and TL350 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and TL350.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to produce more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS will have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL350 |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB2000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 lbs) | 195g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $210 | $400 |
