Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL500
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternative Name is EX1
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL500, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") use different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-4 GPS was revealed 3 years after the TL500 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the WG-4 GPS grades vs the TL500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL500. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung TL500
| WG-4 GPS | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 44 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| TL500 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung TL500
| WG-4 GPS | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the TL500.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and TL500 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and TL500.
All in all, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will result in more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung TL500 |
| Alternate name | - | EX1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-07-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $210 | $527 |