Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB150F
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung WB150F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is fairly close and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-4 GPS was unveiled 2 years later than the WB150F and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the WG-4 GPS scores vs the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung WB150F. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung WB150F
| WG-4 GPS | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| WB150F | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung WB150F
| WG-4 GPS | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS enjoys external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung WB150F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the WB150F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and WB150F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and WB150F.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to result in greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung WB150F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 188 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $210 | $230 |