Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB210
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB210, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-4 GPS was manufactured 2 years later than the WB210 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the WG-4 GPS scores against the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung WB210
| WG-4 GPS | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 1k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| WB210 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung WB210
| WG-4 GPS | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB210 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the WB210.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and WB210 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and WB210.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB210 Portrait photography factors
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
you can focus manually
decent MP (14 megapixels)
features face detect focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography info
Samsung WB210 Street photography info
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than others (235g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports focus via touch
lighter than competition in class (174 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography information
Samsung WB210 Sports photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
max frames per second low (2.0 frames/s)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (240 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Travel photography with Samsung WB210
environment proofing
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery power (240 per charge)
more heavy than others (235g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lighter than competition in class (174g)
supports focus via touch
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB210 as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery power (240 per charge)
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging features
Samsung WB210 Vlogging features
decently wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of microphone support
more heavy than others (235g)
rather wide (24mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (174g)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone socket
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) | 174 grams (0.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $210 | $279 |