Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB2200F
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Launched January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung WB2200F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-4 GPS was revealed within a month of the WB2200F so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the WB2200F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung WB2200F
| WG-4 GPS | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| WB2200F | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung WB2200F
| WG-4 GPS | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2014 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung WB2200F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the WB2200F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and WB2200F is 90 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and WB2200F.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of files although you have to consider the release date of the cameras into account.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography information
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography information
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
has face detect focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography information
Samsung WB2200F Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competition (235 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (708 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography features
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography features
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
low fps (2.0 fps)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (240 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography factors
weather sealing
decent MP (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery (240 CIPA)
heavier than competition (235 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (20mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (708g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Landscape photography camera
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
weather sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
bad battery (240 shots)
focusing manually
pretty wide (20mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Vlogging with Samsung WB2200F
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic socket
heavier than competition (235g)
pretty wide (20mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic port
heavier than competition in class (708g)
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 708 gr (1.56 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $210 | $599 |