Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ec74/7ec74ffc74df7a1174a1a0d12e55c19e0c4feb84" alt="Sigma DP2 front Sigma DP2 front"
86 Imaging
44 Features
28 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2009
- Updated by Sigma DP2s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and DP2 (5MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and DP2 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was introduced 4 years later than the DP2 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WG-4 GPS matches up vs the DP2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sigma DP2. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sigma DP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sigma DP2
WG-4 GPS | DP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | September 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
DP2 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma DP2
WG-4 GPS | DP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 has specifications of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") along with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the DP2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94e8c/94e8ce17809a04565bfaa24a0f94806c77359436" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and DP2 is 90 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d065/1d065b55e481d1dd71a807c8dd635b0b03a2e400" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and DP2.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 GPS using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will provide you with greater detail using its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a8fc/1a8fc738fea639a7364052034990b228fc9c2cd5" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a8ce/3a8ce13a64ae4c2ec7633cb05b69c5ac16542506" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma DP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma DP2 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2009-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 5MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 280g (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $210 | $649 |