Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04d9/f04d99e0c26c31be60485c208bc04019fbc69c93" alt="Sigma DP2 Merrill front Sigma DP2 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Older Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Renewed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was released 2 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the WG-4 GPS matches up vs the DP2 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-4 GPS | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
DP2 Merrill | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-4 GPS | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the DP2 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f59f/7f59f52ad9161fa8545795d10d9e1deea3f44eb4" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and DP2 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15e56/15e566bfb778736b832e1dff6ef1e6aafd916a6a" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and DP2 Merrill.
As you have seen, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 GPS because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS provides a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d60f/5d60ff6c42dc45472ca9bd60f1eb40295fe235fe" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ad00/8ad00075f58a4b312968a76c9850c2846fcefec8" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640x480 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $210 | $931 |