Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Older Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Renewed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was released 2 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the WG-4 GPS matches up vs the DP2 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-4 GPS | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | February 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
DP2 Merrill | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-4 GPS | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the DP2 Merrill.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and DP2 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and DP2 Merrill.
As you have seen, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 GPS because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640x480 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $210 | $931 |