Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
 
Sigma DP2s front
Portability
86
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
  • Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sigma DP2s
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • 320 x 240 video
  • 41mm (F) lens
  • 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
  • Announced February 2010
  • Superseded the Sigma DP2
  • Replacement is Sigma DP2x
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s Overview

In this article, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sigma DP2s, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and DP2s (5MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and DP2s (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The WG-4 GPS was revealed 4 years later than the DP2s and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2s being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the WG-4 GPS matches up against the DP2s with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sigma DP2s

 WG-4 GPS DP2s 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014February 2010Fresher by 49 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2s over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 DP2s WG-4 GPS 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma DP2s

 WG-4 GPS DP2s 
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sigma DP2s has proportions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") having a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).

See the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sigma DP2s in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the DP2s.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and DP2s is 90 and 86 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and DP2s.

All in all, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 GPS using its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will render more detail because of its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography information
Sigma DP2s Portrait photography information
41
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
56
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
MP count low (5 megapixels)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2s as a Street photography camera
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than others in class (235g)
67
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than others (280g)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography factors
Sigma DP2s Sports photography factors
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proofing
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery pack (240 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
30
good sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (41mm)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
MP count low (5MP)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography factors
Sigma DP2s Travel photography factors
69
weather proofing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
low battery pack (240 per charge)
more heavy than others in class (235 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
67
lighter than others (280 grams)
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f)
MP count low (5 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Landscape photography with Sigma DP2s
54
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low battery pack (240 CIPA)
48
you can focus manually
very good max aperture (f)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (41mm)
small screen (2.5 inch)
no image stabilization
MP count low (5 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging details
Sigma DP2s Vlogging details
34
really wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (235g)
28
very good max aperture (f)
lighter than others (280 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (320 x 240 pixels)
no external mic port
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP2s Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma DP2s
 Ricoh WG-4 GPSSigma DP2s
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sigma
Model Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sigma DP2s
Type Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Released 2014-02-05 2010-02-20
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - True II
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 5MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 2640 x 1760
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 125 50
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 41mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 2.5 inches
Display resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 15 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (Auto ISO) 4.30 m
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 320 x 240
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 320x240
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 235 gr (0.52 lb) 280 gr (0.62 lb)
Dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal SD/SDHC/MMC card
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $210 $940