Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched January 2013
- Succeeded the Sigma DP2 Merrill
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma DP3 Merrill, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is fairly close but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-4 GPS was unveiled 14 months after the DP3 Merrill making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the DP3 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sigma DP3 Merrill. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
WG-4 GPS | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | January 2013 | More modern by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
DP3 Merrill | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma DP3 Merrill
WG-4 GPS | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP3 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma DP3 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the DP3 Merrill.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and DP3 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and DP3 Merrill.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will result in greater detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 GPS will have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 330g (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $210 | $1,353 |